OnePlus 3
Previous OnePlus smartphones have claimed to be “flagship killers”. That’s still not quite accurate, but the OnePlus 3 is a very good smartphone priced at less than half the price of top rivals.
-- As reviewed by The Guardian

Product details
- For USA Buyers: This Smartphone is not compatible/will not work with any CDMA Networks including: VERIZON, SPRINT, US CELLULAR. Please check with your network provider for 3G or 4G/LTE compatibility check before you purchase.
- Dual-SIM, Network Compatibility, SIM CARD 1 & 2 : [2G : GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 and/or 3G : HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 and/or 4G : LTE TDD 700(B12) / 700(B13) / 700(B17) / 700(B28) / 800(B20) / 850(B5) / 850(B18) / 850(B19) / 850(B26) / 900(B8) / 1500(B32) / 1700|2100(B4) / 1800(B3) / 1900(B2) / 2100(B1) / 2600(B7) / 2600(B38) LTE FDD 1900(B39) / 2100(B66) / 2300(B40) / 2500(B41)and/or 5G : 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78 SA/NSA]
- 6.72 inches, IPS LCD, 1080 x 2400 pixels, Corning Gorilla Glass
- 128GB Storage, 8GB RAM, microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
- Android 13, Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm), Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
- 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro), 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth), Front, 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm
PROS
+ all-metal
+ great fingerprint sensor
+ good screen
+ fast charging
+ good cameras
+ excellent notification slider
+ dual-Sim with dual standby
+ cheaper than rivals
CONS
- no removable battery
- no expandable storage
- slow charging from non-Dash charge power adapters
- screen low res for VR
Related products
Expert reviews and ratings
By The Verge on June 14, 2016
The OnePlus 3 is a serious contender
86
By The Guardian on June 14, 2016
Previous OnePlus smartphones have claimed to be “flagship killers”. That’s still not quite accurate, but the OnePlus 3 is a very good smartphone priced at less than half the price of top rivals.
100
By TechAdvisor on February 02, 2017
The OnePlus 3 is another amazing smartphone from the Chinese company as easily its best effort yet. It’s a little bit more expensive than its predecessor but it’s still a ridiculous price considering the design, build and hardware on offer which matches rivals but also beats them in some areas. There’s very little to dislike here unless you really need things like expandable storage and waterproofing. You don’t even need an invite any longer, either.
90
By TechRadar on November 20, 2017
The Chinese startup has improved on a number of issues fans had with its predecessor, wrapping the OnePlus 3 in a new premium suit and managed to keep the price low enough to worry the established names in the market.
90
By TechAdvisor on November 17, 2016
If you already own the OnePlus 3, don’t be too upset that it’s been superceded. The OnePlus 3T will more than certainly be a little faster, last a little longer and take better selfies, but the OnePlus 3 is still an awesome phone and a match for many of the best phones of 2016. If you’re completely new to the OnePlus 3 and OnePlus 3T, while stocks last the OnePlus 3 is the more affordable option at £329 and, in that sense at least, could still be the better phone.
?
By TrustedReviews on June 23, 2016
OnePlus has replaced its OnePlus 3 with the 3T, a souped up model with a faster CPU and an updated selfie camera. Read our
90
By TrustedReviews on June 23, 2016
The first two OnePlus phones featured LCD screens. OnePlus had a crack at an OLED phone with the OnePlus X, and the OnePlus 3 continues that here with a Super AMOLED Samsung screen.
90
By TrustedReviews on June 23, 2016
The OnePlus 3 has very familiar camera hardware. On the rear sits a Sony IMX298 16-megapixel sensor, used in both the
90
By TrustedReviews on June 23, 2016
As ever, the core hardware featured in the OnePlus 3 is fairly aggressive. It runs on a a Snapdragon 820 CPU, which is the same used in the more expensive
90
By TrustedReviews on June 23, 2016
The OnePlus 3’s battery life is less notable. Stamina is inconsistent, although it do believe it was a blessing that the screen resolution wasn’t bumped up to QHD or 4K.
90